"Aucun État, aucune région pris séparément, n'a le droit de se dire modèle du reste du monde."

— Alexandre Douguine, L’Appel de l’Eurasie (2013)

« Maintenant, je marcherai avec n’importe quel type qui foutra ce régime par terre, avec n’importe qui, à n’importe quelle condition. »

— Pierre Drieu la Rochelle, Gilles (1939)

« La défaite de Carthage décida de ce que serait l’Europe : terre ou mer. Ce fut la formule finale, l’État continental, qui triompha de la thalassocratie. »

— Jean Thiriart, L’Empire euro-soviétique de Vladivostok à Dublin (1984)

The Pan-Fascist Paradox: How Does a Nationalist-Minded Fascist Think Transnationally?
by Aron Brouwer

To better understand cross-border fascist solidarity, this article suggests a new conceptual framework revolving around the term ‘pan-fascism’ and its ‘paradox’. It argues that the existence or non-existence of a pan-fascist ‘paradox’ in the minds of historical fascists is a matter of optics, as it all depends on who is mobilizing the notion of fascist transnationalism. Because of such optical issues, which all must be unpacked historically, the conceptual framework of ‘pan-fascism’ does not offer a simple solution. It, rather, puts emphasis on a key question: how did certain fascists, at various moments in their lives, think about the possibility of fascist transnationalism? This paper takes the work, thought, and practices of the French editors of Je suis partout as a case study, and demonstrates how they attempted to reconcile their commitment to French nationalism with fascist transnationalism.

Mon devoir de mémoire.
8 février 1861, création des États confédérés d’Amérique.
8 février 2017, assassinat du colonel Mikhaïl Tolstykh Givi.

“Rather die as European than rot as American.”

Karl Haushofer

Chaque mètre carré conquis par les Russes en Ukraine est un mètre carré où la démocratie cosmopolite meurt définitivement.

“Under Stalin’s leadership, the Soviet Union transitioned from the revolutionary internationalism of Lenin to a distinctly national and ethnopluralist orientation. This shift was encapsulated in Stalin’s principle of ‘building socialism in one country,’ which prioritized the solidification of socialism within the Soviet state over global revolutionary aims. Unlike Lenin’s insistence on the universality of the proletarian struggle, Stalin recognized the significance of national identities, cultures, and traditions as integral to the socialist project. His policies embraced the idea that socialism could and should develop within the framework of distinct national forms, a reflection of his understanding of the ethnic and cultural spectrum of the Soviet Union.”

— Constantin von Hoffmeister, MULTIPOLARITY!

Buy it now:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1917646070

Le dandysme, une manière de vivre de la vraie droite.

C'est fait par le Diocèse de Paris et c'est passionnant !
https://dioceseparis.fr/le-raskol-conservatisme.html

Ukraine faces population replacement with Third-World migrants after the war
https://rmx.news/ukraine/ukraine-faces-population-replacement-with-third-world-migrants-after-the-war/