2022 gingen rund 36% der in der Schweiz verbrauchten Endenergie auf das Konto des Verkehrs.

2021 beliefen sich die CO2-Emissionen des Verkehrs ohne die internationale Luftfahrt auf 13,7 Millionen Tonnen. Dies entsprach 38% der CO2-Emissionen der Schweiz https://perma.cc/9D7M-D7Y6

Im Jahr 2022 ereigneten sich in der Schweiz über 18 000 Verkehrsunfälle mit Personenschaden. Dabei verloren ungefähr 270 Menschen ihr Leben, davon 241 bei Strassenverkehrsunfällen, 21 bei Eisenbahnunfällen und 4 bei Flugunfällen https://perma.cc/Z5YR-6GAS

Autofahren ist in der Schweiz viel zu günstig. Denn die negativen Auswirkungen des Individualverkehrs wie Luftverschmutzung, Klimaschädigung und Lärm haben hohe Kosten zur Folge. Laut dem Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung hat unser Mobilitätsverhalten 2018 (ohne Luftfahrt) rund 12,2 Milliarden Franken an externen Kosten verursacht https://perma.cc/Q6TQ-453J

Für mittlere Distanzen steht das E-Bike ganz oben auf der Rangliste der klimafreundlichen Verkehrsmittel. Mit gerade mal 5,4 Gramm CO2 pro Kilometer (Herstellung und Ladung der Akkus eingerechnet) sind E-Bikes unter allen motorisierten Verkehrsmitteln mit Abstand am klimafreundlichsten.

Deshalb ist für grosse Distanzen die Benützung von Zug und Bus sinnvoll.

Next epic fail by "die Grüne"

So related to the F-35 bullshit / AHV
https://www.tgoop.com/DefenceTelegram/1040
to
https://www.tgoop.com/DefenceTelegram/1068

Related to elderly
https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/882
to
https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/912

Related to migration
https://www.tgoop.com/StopRightsAbuseinSwitzerland

Related to airplanes
https://www.tgoop.com/AfDFakten/567
https://www.tgoop.com/PollutionFacts/1035
https://www.tgoop.com/ElonMuskPollution/144
https://www.tgoop.com/ElonMuskPollution/159
https://www.tgoop.com/ElonMuskPollution/173
https://www.tgoop.com/ElonMuskPollution/175

Related to cars
https://www.tgoop.com/NatureFreaksDeutsch/629
to
https://www.tgoop.com/NatureFreaksDeutsch/649
https://www.tgoop.com/PolitikTelegram/23

Plus just one point. IF SOMEONE NEED TO GO FROM A TO B, he will do that, no matter if with a mega xxxl street or a xxxs street ...

This will NOT fix the issue of car pollution!
Especially knowing that people use the car for every shit ...
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/204
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/205
https://www.tgoop.com/LetzteGenerationFakten/45
https://www.tgoop.com/LetzteGenerationFakten/46

We need to change lifestyle!
https://www.tgoop.com/BenShapiroBullshit/12
https://www.tgoop.com/BenShapiroBullshit/13

Stop being indifferent and ignoring things
https://www.tgoop.com/AspergerSyndromeTelegram/53
https://www.tgoop.com/MissionPlaneta/55
https://www.tgoop.com/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/116

Stop thinking that electric cars are the only solution, because they pollute too!
https://www.tgoop.com/MissionPlaneta/57
https://www.tgoop.com/MissionPlaneta/58

We need to implement max 100-120 km/h automatically based on GPS!
https://www.tgoop.com/LawsTelegram/52
https://www.tgoop.com/LawsTelegram/53
https://www.tgoop.com/LawsTelegram/105
https://www.tgoop.com/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/109

We need to implement huge expensive fines if someone is doing too much km without providing a valid reason!
https://www.tgoop.com/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/119
https://www.tgoop.com/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/120

Related
https://www.tgoop.com/SciencePoliticalParty/19
https://www.tgoop.com/SciencePoliticalParty/11
https://www.tgoop.com/SciencePoliticalParty/10
https://www.tgoop.com/SciencePoliticalParty/50
https://www.tgoop.com/SciencePoliticalParty/55

Plus exactly, why do we need a top speed of 150 km/h+ ... what is the sense of having that .. even if a car is able to do?! They should block that per default.

It's time to stop seeing such idiot people
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/47
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/44
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/77
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/101
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/102
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/104
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/107
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/109
& rich people
https://www.tgoop.com/CarAccidentsFacts/178

Not just related to the topic pollution, but even for the safety of other people, for the safety of animals and because there is NO REASON you need to go 150 km/h!

150 km/h for 2 hours = 300 km
120 km/h for 2 hours = 240 km —> 2.5h trip ... seriously do you have not 30 minutes more for the safety and the love of our planet?
100 km/h for 2 hours = 200 km —> 3 h trip

Let we say for example 140 g/km with 100 km/h, 150 g/km with 120 km/h and 190 g/km with 150 km/h

this means for 300 km 42k vs 45k vs 57k

so 1.07x with 120 km/h and 1.35x with 150 km/h if we consider 100 km/h as default = 1 hour more of trip

If we consider 120 km/h as default —> 1.26x with 150 km/h! now if everyone is doing that ...
https://www.tgoop.com/PollutionFacts/1186

Several studies have found that the carbon intensity of the electricity in the operation phase determines the advantage – or disadvantage – of adopting BEVs over ICEVs with regard to GHG emissions. While relatively similar lifecycle emissions are achieved by charging BEVs with electricity from natural gas, wind-based electricity results in significantly lower lifecycle emissions compared to ICEVs. By contrast, coal-based electricity yields higher lifecycle emissions for BEVs than ICEVs. Hence, in areas where electricity is primarily produced from thermal power plants fired by lignite, coal or heavy oil, BEVs serve as a means of improving urban air quality and shifting emissions away from the densely populated urban centres, rather than reducing emissions.

We repost that, because of low quality with Telegram ...

Gaza conflict's environmental toll: A surge in carbon emissions