Telegram Web
😁15πŸ—Ώ5πŸ¦„2🀯1
me and who?
πŸ₯°36πŸ’‹3πŸ’˜3πŸ‘2❀1πŸ“1πŸ¦„1
i thereby present You: "if You attack/criticize me You're a Colonialist White Supremacist" Russian Asset and fossil-fuel leech-investor, third party con WOman "Green" candidate, sucking off daddy MAGAT money
JILL STEIN
let's roll a round of applause for her, please
❀5😁3πŸ†3πŸ‘2
Post-Foucault
i thereby present You: "if You attack/criticize me You're a Colonialist White Supremacist" Russian Asset and fossil-fuel leech-investor, third party con WOman "Green" candidate, sucking off daddy MAGAT money JILL STEIN let's roll a round of applause for her…
ask fossil fuel-investor, "Green" Jill Stein how many voting members are there in the US house of representatives (twice) and You'll get a (obviously) "the (white-supremacist) democrats are spying on us".

bunch of fucking morons, i swear.
😁5πŸ†1
Jill Stein is a fascist-enabler, a populist-opportunist, and a plain fucking idiot.
the "Left", any there be, deciding not to vote, or to vote for an incompetent liar and manipulator - with whatever form of mental gymnastics to justify it - have allowed the rise/election of a Fascist[possibly twice], wannabe dictator, and its goblins.
They are as much deluded and eating the ideological garbage of the post-political, post-truth politics, as much as whom they "claim to despise"(some, at least.
can't even say that for many - since no distinction is made).
this mental malaise and cognitive retardat*on is so present and diffuse that it makes no sense to ask for their 'real' intentions.
πŸ™10πŸ€”6πŸ‘4πŸ‘»2🀩1πŸ—Ώ1
Bojack Horseman (2014-2024)
❀‍πŸ”₯13😒8❀3πŸ’˜3
pleasepleaseplease.
❀‍πŸ”₯14❀3
I'm directing Amelie 2, a day in Paris (2025).
❀‍πŸ”₯31🀯2πŸ†2πŸ‘1πŸ¦„1
please save me!!
Gas Food Lodging (1992); Allison Anders
πŸ₯°8❀6❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ‘1😒1
❀‍πŸ”₯9😁2❀1
😁25πŸ†10πŸ—Ώ5πŸ“3πŸ‘2
Forwarded from Post-Foucault
Nazism might even be characterized as the pure politics of effort; the absolute dominion of the collective super-ego in its annihilating rigor. Nothing could be more politically disastrous than the launching of a moral case against Nazism: Nazism is morality itself, heir to Europe's respectable history: that of witch-burnings, inquisitions, and pogroms. To want to be in the right is the common substratum of morality and genocidal reaction;
the same desire for repression - organized in terms of the disapproving gaze of the father - that Anti-Oedipus analyzes with such power. Who could imagine Nazism without daddy? And who could imagine daddy being pre-figured in the energetic unconscious?
Death is too simple, too fluid, too disdainful of races and fatherlands to have anything much to do with the Nazis. Ressentiment was something they knew about, as was the aspiration to a mythic sacrifice, a Gotterdammerungthat would inscribe them in the history books, but these things never stretch to dissolution-desire. After all, lose control and you might end up fucking with a Jew, becoming effeminate, or creating something degenerate like a work of art. Does anyone really think that Nazism is like letting go? The weleit's studies of Nazi body posture should be sufficient to disabuse one of such an absurdity.
Nazism can turn you into a stiff before the messy passage into death.
N. Land; Making it with Death
❀‍πŸ”₯14πŸ’˜5πŸ‘»3
❀17πŸ’˜10πŸ‘3
So me fr
❀‍πŸ”₯22😒4πŸ’˜3πŸ“2❀1
🫑10
2025/07/12 19:53:21
Back to Top
HTML Embed Code: