SubhanAllah what a difference a DM can make in going from deviant to non-deviant in the eyes of a Rabbi!
People ask: "Are the Wahhabis attacking Daniel all on some kind of payroll? Isn't that hard to believe?"
That's not exactly how things work in the "politics of dawah."
Yes, some people are literally paid agents, as we've proven on MuslimSkeptic over the years.
But the more common factor is carrot/stick tactics used to encourage or coerce duat to do things that align with a larger political agenda.
This is what is being done to Uthman bin Farooq in a very transparent way by UAE agent Rabbi Faris.
That's why I dissect it in depth on this stream, so that you can see for yourself how it works in detail.
https://www.youtube.com/live/XlOmi1Bw3pw
That's not exactly how things work in the "politics of dawah."
Yes, some people are literally paid agents, as we've proven on MuslimSkeptic over the years.
But the more common factor is carrot/stick tactics used to encourage or coerce duat to do things that align with a larger political agenda.
This is what is being done to Uthman bin Farooq in a very transparent way by UAE agent Rabbi Faris.
That's why I dissect it in depth on this stream, so that you can see for yourself how it works in detail.
https://www.youtube.com/live/XlOmi1Bw3pw
This is UNBELIEVABLE
Jake confirms that he and Rabbi Faris are on excellent terms.
Shockingly, he admits that suddenly he has no problem with Rabbi Faris' fatwa that boycotting Israel is haram terrorism.
Jake slammed Rabbi Faris in the past for saying boycotting Israel is haram.
Now, after a private convo, he think Rabbi Faris has a perfectly legitimate position. Wow!
No wonder Jake dodged Hijab's question about Madkhalis. "Happier than a pig in mud" didn't want to alienate his Judeo-Muslim friends.
Only one question Jake. When are you flying to Dubai to start teaching your classes on making dua to jinn? Maybe you can also give us a virtual tour of the Hindu temples while you're there.
Jake confirms that he and Rabbi Faris are on excellent terms.
Shockingly, he admits that suddenly he has no problem with Rabbi Faris' fatwa that boycotting Israel is haram terrorism.
Jake slammed Rabbi Faris in the past for saying boycotting Israel is haram.
Now, after a private convo, he think Rabbi Faris has a perfectly legitimate position. Wow!
No wonder Jake dodged Hijab's question about Madkhalis. "Happier than a pig in mud" didn't want to alienate his Judeo-Muslim friends.
Only one question Jake. When are you flying to Dubai to start teaching your classes on making dua to jinn? Maybe you can also give us a virtual tour of the Hindu temples while you're there.
Palestine exposes everyone, but especially Wahhabis.
In three short days, Adnan Rashid comes out to insult the Palestinian leaders as fools.
Jake Bancatella comes out to defend Rabbi Faris' fatwa that "boycotting Israel is haram."
You still think their months-long campaign against me is about some subtle theoretical issues in secondary aqida topics? Wake up.
In three short days, Adnan Rashid comes out to insult the Palestinian leaders as fools.
Jake Bancatella comes out to defend Rabbi Faris' fatwa that "boycotting Israel is haram."
You still think their months-long campaign against me is about some subtle theoretical issues in secondary aqida topics? Wake up.
Going LIVE in 30min with new information to finish this inshaAllah.
https://www.youtube.com/live/UA11DxXIejI
https://www.youtube.com/live/UA11DxXIejI
YouTube
JAKE EXPOSED - HIS MADKHALI PARTNERS | Haqiqat Show Ep. 47
#HaqiqatShow #Haqiqatjou #muslimskeptic
Support our work with a donation: https://muslimskeptic.com/contribute/
Newsletter: https://muslimskeptic.com/newsletter
MuslimSkeptic:
Twitter: https://x.com/muslimskeptichq
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/MuslimSkeptic…
Support our work with a donation: https://muslimskeptic.com/contribute/
Newsletter: https://muslimskeptic.com/newsletter
MuslimSkeptic:
Twitter: https://x.com/muslimskeptichq
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/MuslimSkeptic…
Israel is planning the next phase of its territorial expansion project. This involves:
- Expelling all Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank and relocating them to refugee camps in Egypt, Saudi, and Jordan
- Launching a full-scale war on Iran
- Solidifying and expanding their occupation of Southern Syria and Southern Lebanon
- Occupying Masjid Aqsa and opening it to Jewish worshippers
These moves will generate mass death of Muslims, causing global outrage, especially from Muslims themselves.
Thus, Israel needs its Arab partners to help quell this outrage among Muslims before it escalates to something that can threaten Israel's security.
With the help of a vast Zionist intelligence network, the UAE and Saudi have launched an influence operation to fight against anti-Israel sentiment among Muslims. This operation went into second gear after Oct 7th.
This influence operation focuses on different segments of people. For Salafi-oriented religious Muslims in the English language, figures like Rabbi Faris Hammadi, Shamsi, Wajdi, Shahid Bolsen and others have been deployed.
These agents have claimed:
- Palestinians are mushrik grave worshippers
- Palestinians are deviants for accepting help from Iran
- Palestinians are to blame for Israel's actions because Palestinians foolishly attacked Israel on Oct 7th
- Hamas is a deviant terrorist organization
- Iran and its allies are kafir nations worse than Israel
- Boycotting Israel is haram and it harms Muslims
- Normalizing relations with Israel is halal and benefits Muslims
- Normalizing relations with Israel helps Palestinians specifically
- The Gulf rulers and their Arab allies are playing 4D chess and must be trusted in all their actions and must never be criticized
All these claims have been pushed by the Madkhali network.
Now you can better appreciate why the Wahhabi Madkhali network has mass mobilized to attack me, calling me a deviant and a kafir to discredit me.
Who is the biggest Muslim critic of Israel and the Gulf normalization with Israel in the English speaking world? Whose news site has the most articles critiquing "Muslim Zionism"? Who has written and spoken out the most against the Abrahamic religion and the Abraham Accords? Who has the most viewed video on Madkhalism in the English language?
It should be very obvious why these Gulf regimes would want to neutralize me. And they have even brought on their Zionist partners, like the ADL, to launch smear campaigns against me.
Their latest strategy has been to draw on their larger network of Wahhabi influencers to nonstop criticize me and smear me as a kafir. This is where Jake, Farid, Adnan, and others come in. This is why Jake and Farid might make vague negative statements about Zionism to save face, but have nothing critical to say about the Gulf, Israeli normalization, or Rabbi Faris. They are all working together.
You don't have to like me or support me. Thats no problem. But at least don't let these Judeo-Muslims fool you or distract you from what is really happening.
- Expelling all Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank and relocating them to refugee camps in Egypt, Saudi, and Jordan
- Launching a full-scale war on Iran
- Solidifying and expanding their occupation of Southern Syria and Southern Lebanon
- Occupying Masjid Aqsa and opening it to Jewish worshippers
These moves will generate mass death of Muslims, causing global outrage, especially from Muslims themselves.
Thus, Israel needs its Arab partners to help quell this outrage among Muslims before it escalates to something that can threaten Israel's security.
With the help of a vast Zionist intelligence network, the UAE and Saudi have launched an influence operation to fight against anti-Israel sentiment among Muslims. This operation went into second gear after Oct 7th.
This influence operation focuses on different segments of people. For Salafi-oriented religious Muslims in the English language, figures like Rabbi Faris Hammadi, Shamsi, Wajdi, Shahid Bolsen and others have been deployed.
These agents have claimed:
- Palestinians are mushrik grave worshippers
- Palestinians are deviants for accepting help from Iran
- Palestinians are to blame for Israel's actions because Palestinians foolishly attacked Israel on Oct 7th
- Hamas is a deviant terrorist organization
- Iran and its allies are kafir nations worse than Israel
- Boycotting Israel is haram and it harms Muslims
- Normalizing relations with Israel is halal and benefits Muslims
- Normalizing relations with Israel helps Palestinians specifically
- The Gulf rulers and their Arab allies are playing 4D chess and must be trusted in all their actions and must never be criticized
All these claims have been pushed by the Madkhali network.
Now you can better appreciate why the Wahhabi Madkhali network has mass mobilized to attack me, calling me a deviant and a kafir to discredit me.
Who is the biggest Muslim critic of Israel and the Gulf normalization with Israel in the English speaking world? Whose news site has the most articles critiquing "Muslim Zionism"? Who has written and spoken out the most against the Abrahamic religion and the Abraham Accords? Who has the most viewed video on Madkhalism in the English language?
It should be very obvious why these Gulf regimes would want to neutralize me. And they have even brought on their Zionist partners, like the ADL, to launch smear campaigns against me.
Their latest strategy has been to draw on their larger network of Wahhabi influencers to nonstop criticize me and smear me as a kafir. This is where Jake, Farid, Adnan, and others come in. This is why Jake and Farid might make vague negative statements about Zionism to save face, but have nothing critical to say about the Gulf, Israeli normalization, or Rabbi Faris. They are all working together.
You don't have to like me or support me. Thats no problem. But at least don't let these Judeo-Muslims fool you or distract you from what is really happening.
Why did Rabbi Faris decide to publicly attack Uthman ibn Farooq now, after spending years collecting a long list of Uthman's "deviant violations"?
The essence of Wahhabi thought is creating arguments to takfir all non-Wahhabis, and then applying these arguments to justify attacks on Muslims who resist Wahhabi political control.
Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhab claimed that all the scholars and laymen of his era were kafirs because they made theological mistakes.
He further claimed that the meaning of the shahada required identifying all kafir groups, declaring them to be kafirs, disassociating from them, and waging jihad against them.
In particular, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab waged jihad against all Muslims who did not submit to the rule of the early Saudi state that he helped establish.
Inspired by Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's ideas, his followers carefully study the doctrines of every other Muslim group.
They look for any doctrine of "kufr" (i.e., any doctrine which causes a person to become a kafir).
Using this method, Wahhabis have developed arguments that the Asharis and Maturidis are kafirs. They have also developed arguments that all four legal schools are kufr.
Wahhabis claim that Asharis and Maturidis endorse kufr because they deny that Allah is physically located above the throne. It is claimed that this is kufr because it is known with certainty (ma'lum min al-din bi-darura) that Allah is physically located above the throne).
Wahhabis further claim that the four legal schools (Hanafis, Malikis, Shafiis, Hanbalis) endorse kufr, because they deny that istighatha is shirk akbar. It is claimed that this is kufr because it is known with certainty (ma'lum min al-din bi-l-darura) that istigatha is shirk akbar.
Needless to say, Wahhabis also claim that the Shia also endorse kufr (e.g., based on the argument that they believe in tahrif of the Quran, that they deny that Abu Bakr was a legitimate Caliph, etc.).
This is based on the thinking of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, who declared all the Asharis, Maturidis, followers of the four legal schools, and Shia - of this time - to be kafirs.
But here there is an important qualification.
In Islam, simply endorsing kufr does not automatically make one a kafir. If one only endorses kufr due to lack of knowledge (i.e., ignorance), one can be temporarily excused. The excuse disappears once a Muslim has received the knowledge through adequate instruction. This is known as excusing for ignorance (al-udhr bi-l-jahl).
A key characteristic of the principle of excusing for ignorance is that it can be subjective. Hence, whenever there is a Muslim who endorses kufr, one can always claim that he has already received sufficient instruction and hence should be considered a kafir and fought through jihad. Alternatively, one can always claim that he has not received sufficient instruction, and hence should not be declared a kafir and fought (yet).
This is extremely important for understanding Wahhabis. They have already collected evidence, which to their minds, proves that all non-Wahhabis endorse kufr. The only question is whether to declare them kafirs now and fight them now, or give them some more time.
It's like having a blackmail file prepared on all Muslims.
What guides Wahhabis in these decisions is political interests, rather than principles. Thus, whenever a non-Wahhabi opposes Wahhabi rule and political interests, he is declared a kafir who has received sufficient instruction. But whenever a non-Wahhabi does not oppose Wahhabis, they give him more time before declaring him a kafir.
It is on these grounds that Wahhabis declared other Arab tribes and the entire Ottoman empire kafirs for politically opposing them.
Similarly, whenever a political leader allies with a Wahhabi state (e.g., Saudi Arabia), he is not declared a kafir (e.g., MBZ, Asad). But a political leader which opposes the Wahhabi state (e.g., Saddam Husayn) is declared a kafir.
Wahhabi Dawah groups work in the same way.
The essence of Wahhabi thought is creating arguments to takfir all non-Wahhabis, and then applying these arguments to justify attacks on Muslims who resist Wahhabi political control.
Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhab claimed that all the scholars and laymen of his era were kafirs because they made theological mistakes.
He further claimed that the meaning of the shahada required identifying all kafir groups, declaring them to be kafirs, disassociating from them, and waging jihad against them.
In particular, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab waged jihad against all Muslims who did not submit to the rule of the early Saudi state that he helped establish.
Inspired by Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's ideas, his followers carefully study the doctrines of every other Muslim group.
They look for any doctrine of "kufr" (i.e., any doctrine which causes a person to become a kafir).
Using this method, Wahhabis have developed arguments that the Asharis and Maturidis are kafirs. They have also developed arguments that all four legal schools are kufr.
Wahhabis claim that Asharis and Maturidis endorse kufr because they deny that Allah is physically located above the throne. It is claimed that this is kufr because it is known with certainty (ma'lum min al-din bi-darura) that Allah is physically located above the throne).
Wahhabis further claim that the four legal schools (Hanafis, Malikis, Shafiis, Hanbalis) endorse kufr, because they deny that istighatha is shirk akbar. It is claimed that this is kufr because it is known with certainty (ma'lum min al-din bi-l-darura) that istigatha is shirk akbar.
Needless to say, Wahhabis also claim that the Shia also endorse kufr (e.g., based on the argument that they believe in tahrif of the Quran, that they deny that Abu Bakr was a legitimate Caliph, etc.).
This is based on the thinking of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, who declared all the Asharis, Maturidis, followers of the four legal schools, and Shia - of this time - to be kafirs.
But here there is an important qualification.
In Islam, simply endorsing kufr does not automatically make one a kafir. If one only endorses kufr due to lack of knowledge (i.e., ignorance), one can be temporarily excused. The excuse disappears once a Muslim has received the knowledge through adequate instruction. This is known as excusing for ignorance (al-udhr bi-l-jahl).
A key characteristic of the principle of excusing for ignorance is that it can be subjective. Hence, whenever there is a Muslim who endorses kufr, one can always claim that he has already received sufficient instruction and hence should be considered a kafir and fought through jihad. Alternatively, one can always claim that he has not received sufficient instruction, and hence should not be declared a kafir and fought (yet).
This is extremely important for understanding Wahhabis. They have already collected evidence, which to their minds, proves that all non-Wahhabis endorse kufr. The only question is whether to declare them kafirs now and fight them now, or give them some more time.
It's like having a blackmail file prepared on all Muslims.
What guides Wahhabis in these decisions is political interests, rather than principles. Thus, whenever a non-Wahhabi opposes Wahhabi rule and political interests, he is declared a kafir who has received sufficient instruction. But whenever a non-Wahhabi does not oppose Wahhabis, they give him more time before declaring him a kafir.
It is on these grounds that Wahhabis declared other Arab tribes and the entire Ottoman empire kafirs for politically opposing them.
Similarly, whenever a political leader allies with a Wahhabi state (e.g., Saudi Arabia), he is not declared a kafir (e.g., MBZ, Asad). But a political leader which opposes the Wahhabi state (e.g., Saddam Husayn) is declared a kafir.
Wahhabi Dawah groups work in the same way.
Whenever Wahhabis encounter a rival, or a potential opponent who will not submit to them, they do detailed research into his beliefs to develop the "blackmail" file.
They deny that a person has the right not to make public his detailed beliefs. A person who does this is accused of "hiding" his aqida. To determine every person's beliefs, Wahhabis constantly "test them" (e.g., aqida checks). They then make these files on their opponents, where they compile (allegedly) kufr beliefs held by the person.
Ultimately, when Wahhabis judge a person, the most important thing is not his beliefs, but rather whether he politically opposes Wahhabis.
Hence, despite the fact that my beliefs are far closer to Wahhabis than many others, they takfir me the most. The reason is politics.
Wahhabis like Faris, Shamsi, Farid, and Jake carefully collect information on me, Muhammad Hijab, Ali Dawah, Uthman Faruq and others.
They then demand that we submit or they will first declare us deviants - and if we keep resisting - they will declare us kafirs.
They already declare me a kafir because I not only refuse to submit, but aggressively attack them in retaliation by publicly exposing them.
They deny that a person has the right not to make public his detailed beliefs. A person who does this is accused of "hiding" his aqida. To determine every person's beliefs, Wahhabis constantly "test them" (e.g., aqida checks). They then make these files on their opponents, where they compile (allegedly) kufr beliefs held by the person.
Ultimately, when Wahhabis judge a person, the most important thing is not his beliefs, but rather whether he politically opposes Wahhabis.
Hence, despite the fact that my beliefs are far closer to Wahhabis than many others, they takfir me the most. The reason is politics.
Wahhabis like Faris, Shamsi, Farid, and Jake carefully collect information on me, Muhammad Hijab, Ali Dawah, Uthman Faruq and others.
They then demand that we submit or they will first declare us deviants - and if we keep resisting - they will declare us kafirs.
They already declare me a kafir because I not only refuse to submit, but aggressively attack them in retaliation by publicly exposing them.
Great thread on how the UAE deploys Madkhalis to undermine pro-Palestine sentiment in the West.
https://x.com/warfareanalysis/status/1891394929173156080
https://x.com/warfareanalysis/status/1891394929173156080