π174π±98π34π17πΏ16π’11π6π₯5π3β€2
Woodstown Weekly Windup returns for the first show of 2025, LIVE at the top of the hour!
https://rumble.com/v65vy2s-woodstown-weekly-windup-ep.-16-new-year-new-show.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
https://rumble.com/v65vy2s-woodstown-weekly-windup-ep.-16-new-year-new-show.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Rumble
WoodsTown Weekly Windup ep. 16 | New Year New Show
Superchat the show: https://entropystream.live/keithwoods
β€110π21πΏ7π€·ββ6π5π₯5π±5
Forwarded from Mark Collett
The more people that read this the better.
π434π’168π49π39π±21π₯11π€·ββ7π6β€3πΏ2
Forwarded from Joel Davis
I don't get the concerns of many that the conservative establishment are using borderline White Nationalist talking points to attack their political enemies and win popular support - this is an objectively good thing, it is surrendering to us the moral/ideological high ground.
The idea that it will delude our movement into unduly trusting the conservative establishment is manifestly untrue. Our ideological radicalism on the issues which matter most is only increasing and our criticism of populist figureheads is as sharp as ever - the more concessions we get, the more demanding (not less) we are becoming.
The idea that it will delude our movement into unduly trusting the conservative establishment is manifestly untrue. Our ideological radicalism on the issues which matter most is only increasing and our criticism of populist figureheads is as sharp as ever - the more concessions we get, the more demanding (not less) we are becoming.
π333π44β‘34π€·ββ13π₯10πΏ9β€5π±4π2π1
Good on Elon for helping to publicise this awful anti-white crime
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1876426259162599698
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1876426259162599698
β€544π132β‘51π32π€·ββ27π17π15π12π9πΏ4π₯2
The graph I posted is on ethnic overrepresentation in crime in Europe, not "Islamic crime".
If Tommy Robinson was posting those crime statistics as an argument for immigration restriction and being reposted to 200 million people, yes I would consider that a very good thing.
I'm pretty consistent on this. I've always said it's a positive that larger figures in the conservative movement are starting to adopt nationalist arguments for immigration restriction.
https://www.tgoop.com/nickjfuentes/13821
If Tommy Robinson was posting those crime statistics as an argument for immigration restriction and being reposted to 200 million people, yes I would consider that a very good thing.
I'm pretty consistent on this. I've always said it's a positive that larger figures in the conservative movement are starting to adopt nationalist arguments for immigration restriction.
https://www.tgoop.com/nickjfuentes/13821
Telegram
Nicholas J. Fuentes
βWe have to give Elon credit when he reposts my tweets Muslim rape statistics!!β
Interesting heuristic. So letβs say if Ben Shapiro, Ezra Levant, or Tommy Robinson were amplifying those statistic to their audiences, would we βhave to give them creditβ forβ¦
Interesting heuristic. So letβs say if Ben Shapiro, Ezra Levant, or Tommy Robinson were amplifying those statistic to their audiences, would we βhave to give them creditβ forβ¦
π394π66π€·ββ27β‘21π14πΏ13β€10π7π―4π’3
No, the politics of Musk and Reform donβt exactly line up with nationalists, but Nick has yet to explain how theyβre benefiting over a leftist government is actually at our expense. This would only make sense if Reform were worse for nationalist interests than Labour, or if nationalists were now dropping their own organising and compromising on their radicalism to join Reform, but thatβs not the case.
Reform would do things like abolish hate speech laws and other tyrannical aspects of British law specifically designed to oppress nationalists, and far from nationalists moderating their own views to empower them, Reform being in the conversation has already caused a wave of criticism of Farage for his refusal to endorse mass-deportations. So if nationalists arenβt compromising on their message or commitment to organising independently of the conservative movement, what exactly is the sacrifice here thatβs going to be so costly?
Nick is treating this like nationalists are elite kingmakers in this scenario graciously stepping aside to give Reform a leg up, but thatβs obviousy not the case. We are still on the fringes of the national conversation in most places in the West, and the growth of real nationalism will come alongside a broader shift to a softer populism. Refusing to take the opportunity afforded by something like this to amplify the reality of the Pakistani rape gangs is just giving that ground to the kosher right to direct nativist opposition.
https://www.tgoop.com/nickjfuentes/13834
Reform would do things like abolish hate speech laws and other tyrannical aspects of British law specifically designed to oppress nationalists, and far from nationalists moderating their own views to empower them, Reform being in the conversation has already caused a wave of criticism of Farage for his refusal to endorse mass-deportations. So if nationalists arenβt compromising on their message or commitment to organising independently of the conservative movement, what exactly is the sacrifice here thatβs going to be so costly?
Nick is treating this like nationalists are elite kingmakers in this scenario graciously stepping aside to give Reform a leg up, but thatβs obviousy not the case. We are still on the fringes of the national conversation in most places in the West, and the growth of real nationalism will come alongside a broader shift to a softer populism. Refusing to take the opportunity afforded by something like this to amplify the reality of the Pakistani rape gangs is just giving that ground to the kosher right to direct nativist opposition.
https://www.tgoop.com/nickjfuentes/13834
Telegram
Nicholas J. Fuentes
Letβs say someone is trying to get you to do something for them.
And they say things that they know you want to hear so that you will do it.
And once youβve done their bidding, you realize it actually benefitted them at your expense.
Would you say thatβ¦
And they say things that they know you want to hear so that you will do it.
And once youβve done their bidding, you realize it actually benefitted them at your expense.
Would you say thatβ¦
π417π39π29π€·ββ24β€20πΏ18π―10π7π₯6β‘5
Forwarded from Nicholas J. Fuentes
This is all you need to see.
βHey why would we glaze Elon when he just fucked all of us overβ
βErm well I reposted people talking about that!β Seriously? What a fucking joke.
https://x.com/keithwoodsyt/status/1876987677809037627
βHey why would we glaze Elon when he just fucked all of us overβ
βErm well I reposted people talking about that!β Seriously? What a fucking joke.
https://x.com/keithwoodsyt/status/1876987677809037627
π’285π30π―22π€·ββ16π₯13π9πΏ8π7π3β€2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
On the UK's biggest political podcast, Rory Stewart describes the grooming gangs as confined to just two towns, involving 90 or so men "paying for sex."
That's quite a way to describe men raping children, some as young as 10 years-old, and some of whom were raped so brutally that they required hysterectomies.
What's crazy is that this actually seems to be the extent of his knowledge on the scandal, and this is a man who was once in contention to be leader of the Conservative Party.
X π
That's quite a way to describe men raping children, some as young as 10 years-old, and some of whom were raped so brutally that they required hysterectomies.
What's crazy is that this actually seems to be the extent of his knowledge on the scandal, and this is a man who was once in contention to be leader of the Conservative Party.
X π
π₯311π’87π35π24π±17π7πΏ6π―5π€·ββ4β€1π1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
E. Michael Jones says Pakistanis can become ethnically English if they move to England and speak English
He also says England is doomed if it rejects this because of "racial prejudice"
I know he presents this as the authentic Catholic view, but I think any Catholic prior to the 1960s would have laughed him out of the room if he said this
X π
He also says England is doomed if it rejects this because of "racial prejudice"
I know he presents this as the authentic Catholic view, but I think any Catholic prior to the 1960s would have laughed him out of the room if he said this
X π
π596π117π―99π34π€·ββ21π±10πΏ9π’7β€6π2π2