AntifashGordon Lawsuit
For those wondering about discovery, Exoo appears to be stonewalling his communications. This is the April 1st filing by D’Ambly and I’ll link the most pertinent document. The attachments are just related proof of service. And since all are available and…
In his response to the subpoena Exoo makes some interesting claims.
D’Ambly argues that Exoo’s public statements indicate that there may be further communications pertinent to discovery.
Exoo’s response is
1) the tip about D’Ambly being fired wasn’t entirely accurate
2) the tip was anonymous
3) he’s never communicated with the Daily News or Insite Risk Management.
If all of the above is true, why not just produce the proof?
Second, Exoo never addresses any possible communications with Daryl Lamont Jenkins. He seems to have left that out entirely.
Full filing below with all documents (PACER). Be advised that it’s one single document but it includes all documents in the filing.
D’Ambly argues that Exoo’s public statements indicate that there may be further communications pertinent to discovery.
Exoo’s response is
1) the tip about D’Ambly being fired wasn’t entirely accurate
2) the tip was anonymous
3) he’s never communicated with the Daily News or Insite Risk Management.
If all of the above is true, why not just produce the proof?
Second, Exoo never addresses any possible communications with Daryl Lamont Jenkins. He seems to have left that out entirely.
Full filing below with all documents (PACER). Be advised that it’s one single document but it includes all documents in the filing.
tgoop.com/AntifashGordon/317
Create:
Last Update:
Last Update:
In his response to the subpoena Exoo makes some interesting claims.
D’Ambly argues that Exoo’s public statements indicate that there may be further communications pertinent to discovery.
Exoo’s response is
1) the tip about D’Ambly being fired wasn’t entirely accurate
2) the tip was anonymous
3) he’s never communicated with the Daily News or Insite Risk Management.
If all of the above is true, why not just produce the proof?
Second, Exoo never addresses any possible communications with Daryl Lamont Jenkins. He seems to have left that out entirely.
Full filing below with all documents (PACER). Be advised that it’s one single document but it includes all documents in the filing.
D’Ambly argues that Exoo’s public statements indicate that there may be further communications pertinent to discovery.
Exoo’s response is
1) the tip about D’Ambly being fired wasn’t entirely accurate
2) the tip was anonymous
3) he’s never communicated with the Daily News or Insite Risk Management.
If all of the above is true, why not just produce the proof?
Second, Exoo never addresses any possible communications with Daryl Lamont Jenkins. He seems to have left that out entirely.
Full filing below with all documents (PACER). Be advised that it’s one single document but it includes all documents in the filing.
BY AntifashGordon Lawsuit
Share with your friend now:
tgoop.com/AntifashGordon/317