Carbon dioxide (CO2) Facts on Telegram by GRT : the true behind global greenhouse gas emissions / planet pollution

Average = the most shitty useless information on this planet! ø data is saying ANYTHING, like per capita or total! This happens even related to finance / CO2 pollution and all other aspects in your life.

Previously https://www.tgoop.com/PollutionFacts/517 we talked about mean, mode and median, now let we go to the next step, talking about mean (= ø), total and per capita.

As you can see in this picture, total CO2 pollution from China is greater than USA, but a lot of traffic is available from China to USA. In the yellow graphic we can see how GDP in China increased a lot compared to years ago. 2000 there were 1.2 bio people, now 1.4 = 4.5x than USA (+0.058 bio in 23 years, GDP +29k 1.7x compared to +11k 12x in China)

Now let we check the per capita. China has a low per capita, considering the crazy population they have. Can we say that per capita pollution is a great way to measure pollution? Nope.

First per capita is the same shit like ø money you own used by Credit Suisse
https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/302
https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/314
https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/324
because it's enough 3 people earn 30000000 mio, and the ø is already 💩. In such case the median is better https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/332 but not perfect!

ø is shit in all other topics too, because at the end is saying anything, it's just cool and nothing more.

Back to the pollution per capita. Ok, China has 1.4 mio people, BUT around 5% with less than 4 years, 12% with less than 14, 5% < 19, 19% < 35, 8.5% more than 70 years, 27% more than 50 years https://perma.cc/FT2J-95AG

So a baby or kid is for sure not polluting like a 50+ with tons of money ....

About money, about 1.7 mio people in China have more than 1.2 mio CHF https://perma.cc/ML38-X87E

Some studies are reporting "Air pollution in China is falling — but there is a long way to go". Forecast are saying a decrease too, so what US said "we do nothing, because China is doing nothing" is 2x bullshit.

Check previous post https://www.tgoop.com/PollutionFacts/483

www.tgoop.com/PollutionFacts/518

72 viewsedited  Aug 11, 2023 at 16:17

Average = the most shitty useless information on this planet! ø data is saying ANYTHING, like per capita or total! This happens even related to finance / CO2 pollution and all other aspects in your life.

Previously https://www.tgoop.com/PollutionFacts/517 we talked about mean, mode and median, now let we go to the next step, talking about mean (= ø), total and per capita.

As you can see in this picture, total CO2 pollution from China is greater than USA, but a lot of traffic is available from China to USA. In the yellow graphic we can see how GDP in China increased a lot compared to years ago. 2000 there were 1.2 bio people, now 1.4 = 4.5x than USA (+0.058 bio in 23 years, GDP +29k 1.7x compared to +11k 12x in China)

Now let we check the per capita. China has a low per capita, considering the crazy population they have. Can we say that per capita pollution is a great way to measure pollution? Nope.

First per capita is the same shit like ø money you own used by Credit Suisse
https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/302
https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/314
https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/324
because it's enough 3 people earn 30000000 mio, and the ø is already 💩. In such case the median is better https://www.tgoop.com/FinanceFactsTelegram/332 but not perfect!

ø is shit in all other topics too, because at the end is saying anything, it's just cool and nothing more.

Back to the pollution per capita. Ok, China has 1.4 mio people, BUT around 5% with less than 4 years, 12% with less than 14, 5% < 19, 19% < 35, 8.5% more than 70 years, 27% more than 50 years https://perma.cc/FT2J-95AG

So a baby or kid is for sure not polluting like a 50+ with tons of money ....

About money, about 1.7 mio people in China have more than 1.2 mio CHF https://perma.cc/ML38-X87E

Some studies are reporting "Air pollution in China is falling — but there is a long way to go". Forecast are saying a decrease too, so what US said "we do nothing, because China is doing nothing" is 2x bullshit.

Check previous post https://www.tgoop.com/PollutionFacts/483

BY Carbon dioxide (CO2) Facts on Telegram by GRT : the true behind global greenhouse gas emissions / planet pollution