REMARKS_OF_ORIENTALIST Telegram 1648
My comment on the Turkish decision to join BRICS.

-
The importance of this decision for Türkiye as an alternative to NATO and the EU should not be overestimated. Ankara seemingly understands that BRICS is more a consultative forum
than a pol-mil or economic bloc, whereas member states delegate their certain sovereign powers to the supranational level. I think, the West understands this reality as well.

- Another thing is that, while trying to obtain new concessions from the West (in terms of technology, investments, European perspective), the leadership of Türkiye again demonstrates its readiness to strengthen ties with the Non-Western camp.

At the same time, which is more painfully perceived by the West, Ankara shows unwillingness to support Western steps aimed to politically isolate Russia.

- On the other hand, one can hardly assume that Türkiye's interest in BRICS is purely ephemeral. Ankara does want to use current and future capabilities of BRICS as a perspective platform for facilitating multilateral consultations on a wide range of issues, as well as generating new ideas within the paradigm of sovereignization of foreign and foreign trade policy.

Especially taking into account the fact that BRICS already includes Egypt, Iran, and the UAE, i.e. Türkiye's competitors in the MENA region.

Remarkably, all this reflects an objective trend of the growing attractiveness of BRICS on the world stage, despite the criticism from the West and its allies.

- Although Moscow favors Ankara's stance, it is not worth exaggerating its importance in the long term. Turkish President Erdogan continues to carry out tactical maneuvers, yet, willing to abandon neither European integration nor the strategic dialogue with the West.

Given the deep split of the Turkish elites on the issue of nationalism in foreign policy and the pace of integration with the West, the future of Türkiye's membership in BRICS doesn't appear to be irreversible. Changes in the Turkish leadership could lead to a revision of this imperative, similarly to the Argentinian scenario.



tgoop.com/Remarks_of_Orientalist/1648
Create:
Last Update:

My comment on the Turkish decision to join BRICS.

-
The importance of this decision for Türkiye as an alternative to NATO and the EU should not be overestimated. Ankara seemingly understands that BRICS is more a consultative forum
than a pol-mil or economic bloc, whereas member states delegate their certain sovereign powers to the supranational level. I think, the West understands this reality as well.

- Another thing is that, while trying to obtain new concessions from the West (in terms of technology, investments, European perspective), the leadership of Türkiye again demonstrates its readiness to strengthen ties with the Non-Western camp.

At the same time, which is more painfully perceived by the West, Ankara shows unwillingness to support Western steps aimed to politically isolate Russia.

- On the other hand, one can hardly assume that Türkiye's interest in BRICS is purely ephemeral. Ankara does want to use current and future capabilities of BRICS as a perspective platform for facilitating multilateral consultations on a wide range of issues, as well as generating new ideas within the paradigm of sovereignization of foreign and foreign trade policy.

Especially taking into account the fact that BRICS already includes Egypt, Iran, and the UAE, i.e. Türkiye's competitors in the MENA region.

Remarkably, all this reflects an objective trend of the growing attractiveness of BRICS on the world stage, despite the criticism from the West and its allies.

- Although Moscow favors Ankara's stance, it is not worth exaggerating its importance in the long term. Turkish President Erdogan continues to carry out tactical maneuvers, yet, willing to abandon neither European integration nor the strategic dialogue with the West.

Given the deep split of the Turkish elites on the issue of nationalism in foreign policy and the pace of integration with the West, the future of Türkiye's membership in BRICS doesn't appear to be irreversible. Changes in the Turkish leadership could lead to a revision of this imperative, similarly to the Argentinian scenario.

BY Инсайты Матвеева / Insights from Matveev




Share with your friend now:
tgoop.com/Remarks_of_Orientalist/1648

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram News

Date: |

The court said the defendant had also incited people to commit public nuisance, with messages calling on them to take part in rallies and demonstrations including at Hong Kong International Airport, to block roads and to paralyse the public transportation system. Various forms of protest promoted on the messaging platform included general strikes, lunchtime protests and silent sit-ins. During a meeting with the president of the Supreme Electoral Court (TSE) on June 6, Telegram's Vice President Ilya Perekopsky announced the initiatives. According to the executive, Brazil is the first country in the world where Telegram is introducing the features, which could be expanded to other countries facing threats to democracy through the dissemination of false content. Unlimited number of subscribers per channel The channel also called on people to turn out for illegal assemblies and listed the things that participants should bring along with them, showing prior planning was in the works for riots. The messages also incited people to hurl toxic gas bombs at police and MTR stations, he added. As the broader market downturn continues, yelling online has become the crypto trader’s latest coping mechanism after the rise of Goblintown Ethereum NFTs at the end of May and beginning of June, where holders made incoherent groaning sounds and role-played as urine-loving goblin creatures in late-night Twitter Spaces.
from us


Telegram Инсайты Матвеева / Insights from Matveev
FROM American