Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 13241 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/tgoop/post.php on line 50
Wolf Animal Rights on Telegram by GRT : No death penalty to wolves - death sentence instead to criminals for animal torture!@WolfRights P.21
WOLFRIGHTS Telegram 21
Die Antwort, ohne jetzt alles auf Deutsch zu schreiben. Kurz gesagt "Wölfe agieren so per Natur! und wenn es noch Zeit gibt, gehen sie wieder dort und essen, was sie bis jetzt nicht getan haben!

Originally dubbed “surplus killing” (Kruuk 1972), this phenomenon has also been called “excessive killing” (Carbyn 1983). A fine distinction between the terms has been proposed (Miller et al. 1985), but it is arguable whether this distinction has any relevance. In both cases, wolves kill more than they can immediately consume. However, if sufficient time passes without scavengers finishing off the carcasses, wolves do return and feed on what researchers originally regarded as surplus or excessive (Mech et al. 1998, 2001). Banfield (1954, 49) perceived this behavior more than a half-century ago when he wrote that “what may appear to be excessive killing by wolves seldom goes unutilized in the long run.” The fact is that wolves are programmed to kill and eat whenever they can because generally it requires considerable time, energy, and risk most of the time to do so.



tgoop.com/WolfRights/21
Create:
Last Update:

Die Antwort, ohne jetzt alles auf Deutsch zu schreiben. Kurz gesagt "Wölfe agieren so per Natur! und wenn es noch Zeit gibt, gehen sie wieder dort und essen, was sie bis jetzt nicht getan haben!

Originally dubbed “surplus killing” (Kruuk 1972), this phenomenon has also been called “excessive killing” (Carbyn 1983). A fine distinction between the terms has been proposed (Miller et al. 1985), but it is arguable whether this distinction has any relevance. In both cases, wolves kill more than they can immediately consume. However, if sufficient time passes without scavengers finishing off the carcasses, wolves do return and feed on what researchers originally regarded as surplus or excessive (Mech et al. 1998, 2001). Banfield (1954, 49) perceived this behavior more than a half-century ago when he wrote that “what may appear to be excessive killing by wolves seldom goes unutilized in the long run.” The fact is that wolves are programmed to kill and eat whenever they can because generally it requires considerable time, energy, and risk most of the time to do so.

BY Wolf Animal Rights on Telegram by GRT : No death penalty to wolves - death sentence instead to criminals for animal torture!









Share with your friend now:
tgoop.com/WolfRights/21

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram News

Date: |

Read now Developing social channels based on exchanging a single message isn’t exactly new, of course. Back in 2014, the “Yo” app was launched with the sole purpose of enabling users to send each other the greeting “Yo.” Telegram offers a powerful toolset that allows businesses to create and manage channels, groups, and bots to broadcast messages, engage in conversations, and offer reliable customer support via bots. The court said the defendant had also incited people to commit public nuisance, with messages calling on them to take part in rallies and demonstrations including at Hong Kong International Airport, to block roads and to paralyse the public transportation system. Various forms of protest promoted on the messaging platform included general strikes, lunchtime protests and silent sit-ins. Hui said the messages, which included urging the disruption of airport operations, were attempts to incite followers to make use of poisonous, corrosive or flammable substances to vandalize police vehicles, and also called on others to make weapons to harm police.
from us


Telegram Wolf Animal Rights on Telegram by GRT : No death penalty to wolves - death sentence instead to criminals for animal torture!
FROM American