English Science and Literature club🤓✍️📖

282.

November 3, 2024 (14247)
If psychopolitics is still around in the next 3,000 years – and based on what we already know about the previous 3,000 years, there is no evidence to doubt that – a realistic assessment of its structure is going to be as important as it is today. Which is the most powerful language in the system? How is it related to the second most powerful language? To the third? Who are the most powerful thinkers of these languages? And how are they related to each other? Finally, how powerful is the intention to become the greatest thinker in the one who is doing psychopolitics? And how is it related to other intentions?
All these questions are irrelevant until one – bumping into a great thinker – realizes how fragile and misleading one’s biological instincts might be. Where is Plato’s DNA, and where is his metaphysical castle guarded by Cicero and other great thinkers despite the fact Greek no longer plays a significant role in psychopolitics? Aren’t we still living in the personal histories of Plato and his disciples? If there is no difference between biological and linguistic instincts, and, as Hume says, “all probable reasoning is nothing but a species of sensations,” there is certainly a difference between reasoning in English, Russian or Chinese.
Would Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Marx, Nietzsche – knowing the impact their thinking is going to make on psychopolitics – still have written in German? Whoever believes now that he is an upgraded version of Nietzsche doesn’t probably think about the fate of the German language the same way Nietzsche did. In Nietzsche’s time, it was quite plausible that German was going to be the number one language in psychopolitics for the foreseeable future. Where is this language now? Is it the number four, five, six? Sure, for Germans, it is still number one, but how many great thinkers of today are ready to clad themselves in its armor and use it as a highly tensed bow (or, as we would say today, an atomic cannon) to attack the most powerful thinkers of other languages?
The struggle for power between two or more languages in one’s mind to produce a great thinker must reflect the struggle for power between the most powerful languages on the international level of psychopolitics.

www.tgoop.com/clubscience/61

5 viewsVladimir Svetashev, Nov 3, 2024 at 08:59

282.

November 3, 2024 (14247)
If psychopolitics is still around in the next 3,000 years – and based on what we already know about the previous 3,000 years, there is no evidence to doubt that – a realistic assessment of its structure is going to be as important as it is today. Which is the most powerful language in the system? How is it related to the second most powerful language? To the third? Who are the most powerful thinkers of these languages? And how are they related to each other? Finally, how powerful is the intention to become the greatest thinker in the one who is doing psychopolitics? And how is it related to other intentions?
All these questions are irrelevant until one – bumping into a great thinker – realizes how fragile and misleading one’s biological instincts might be. Where is Plato’s DNA, and where is his metaphysical castle guarded by Cicero and other great thinkers despite the fact Greek no longer plays a significant role in psychopolitics? Aren’t we still living in the personal histories of Plato and his disciples? If there is no difference between biological and linguistic instincts, and, as Hume says, “all probable reasoning is nothing but a species of sensations,” there is certainly a difference between reasoning in English, Russian or Chinese.
Would Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Marx, Nietzsche – knowing the impact their thinking is going to make on psychopolitics – still have written in German? Whoever believes now that he is an upgraded version of Nietzsche doesn’t probably think about the fate of the German language the same way Nietzsche did. In Nietzsche’s time, it was quite plausible that German was going to be the number one language in psychopolitics for the foreseeable future. Where is this language now? Is it the number four, five, six? Sure, for Germans, it is still number one, but how many great thinkers of today are ready to clad themselves in its armor and use it as a highly tensed bow (or, as we would say today, an atomic cannon) to attack the most powerful thinkers of other languages?
The struggle for power between two or more languages in one’s mind to produce a great thinker must reflect the struggle for power between the most powerful languages on the international level of psychopolitics.

BY English Science and Literature club🤓✍️📖