English Science and Literature club🤓✍️📖

286.

November 7, 2024 (14251)
Is it possible to find a great thinker who talks exclusively about oneself without trying to interpret the intentions and actions of other great thinkers? It seems that great thinkers believe they can improve whatever has been done by their predecessors. Cicero believes he can improve Plato and Aristotle by translating them into Latin and adding his own voice to their narratives. Machiavelli believes he can improve Cicero’s narrative by raising valid objections and drawing attention from what should be to what is and had been. Schopenhauer believes he can improve Kant’s critique by adding more substance (and will) to antitheses to help them outweigh theses. Nietzsche believes he can improve Kant and Schopenhauer by turning one of them inside out and the other upside down. Lenin believes he is the only one who got Marx right. I, after reading hundreds of their books and writing thousands of pages in a psychopolitical dialog with them, believe that I can blow up each of their metaphysical castles with my army of psychological, sociological, philosophical, logical, mathematical, naturalistic, biological, historical, political, anthropological, etc. concepts, which I’ve been assembling under my command over the last 17 years.
While wrestling with Cicero and exercising my power, I received a few comments from people who thought that I was bullying him unjustly. I tried to engage them in an argument, demonstrating that psychopolitics is not about making lampoons but that it involves a thorough examination of the works of great thinkers directed by the intention to increase the power of one’s language in an attempt to become the greatest thinker.
It’s been two months since I finished my book and got on the internet to talk about it. If the book had been written in English, I would have already had a dozen people willing to read and criticize it. As I move on with my psychopolitical investigations of other great thinkers, this number must grow from a dozen to a hundred, a thousand, 万, etc. How long is it going to take before the first English thinker learns Russian to read the book? A year? A decade? A century? A…

www.tgoop.com/clubscience/65

6 viewsVladimir Svetashev, edited  Nov 7, 2024 at 11:00

286.

November 7, 2024 (14251)
Is it possible to find a great thinker who talks exclusively about oneself without trying to interpret the intentions and actions of other great thinkers? It seems that great thinkers believe they can improve whatever has been done by their predecessors. Cicero believes he can improve Plato and Aristotle by translating them into Latin and adding his own voice to their narratives. Machiavelli believes he can improve Cicero’s narrative by raising valid objections and drawing attention from what should be to what is and had been. Schopenhauer believes he can improve Kant’s critique by adding more substance (and will) to antitheses to help them outweigh theses. Nietzsche believes he can improve Kant and Schopenhauer by turning one of them inside out and the other upside down. Lenin believes he is the only one who got Marx right. I, after reading hundreds of their books and writing thousands of pages in a psychopolitical dialog with them, believe that I can blow up each of their metaphysical castles with my army of psychological, sociological, philosophical, logical, mathematical, naturalistic, biological, historical, political, anthropological, etc. concepts, which I’ve been assembling under my command over the last 17 years.
While wrestling with Cicero and exercising my power, I received a few comments from people who thought that I was bullying him unjustly. I tried to engage them in an argument, demonstrating that psychopolitics is not about making lampoons but that it involves a thorough examination of the works of great thinkers directed by the intention to increase the power of one’s language in an attempt to become the greatest thinker.
It’s been two months since I finished my book and got on the internet to talk about it. If the book had been written in English, I would have already had a dozen people willing to read and criticize it. As I move on with my psychopolitical investigations of other great thinkers, this number must grow from a dozen to a hundred, a thousand, 万, etc. How long is it going to take before the first English thinker learns Russian to read the book? A year? A decade? A century? A…

BY English Science and Literature club🤓✍️📖