December 16, 2024 (14290) I conducted another poll and handed out three hundred flyers to people on the street. If it helps to attract new “veritatem inquirenti” to my lectures, I have to prepare a special introduction. I’m going to start off by saying that I’ve been running the philosophy club since November 2021. For the first two years, we worked with a variety of subjects like metaphysics, ethics, aesthetics, epistemology, ontology, etc., studying them independently and meeting once a month to have a discussion. One month, we studied a certain topic; the next month, we picked up a certain philosopher: Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Bacon, Hume, Wittgenstein, etc. In the second part of 2023, we focused on Chinese philosophy, studying Confucianism, Daoism, Legalism and Buddhism, as well as such thinkers as Zhu Xi and Zhuang Zhou. I became obsessed with the Chinese language, studying it for eight hours a day in August and attempting to shift my thinking to it in September by writing my diary exclusively with Chinese characters. It caused a “cognitive overdose”, making me unable to focus on anything for the next couple of months. Then, I revived my power and decided to write a book, dedicating to it the entire year of 2024. Simultaneously, I decided to focus on the study of international relations. At the philosophy club, for the first five months of 2024, we got through realism, liberalism, socialism, constructivism and postmodernism. Later, I suggested delving deeper into realism by studying its great thinkers. This suggestion was rejected, and nobody showed up to the club’s meetings during the summer. So, basically, I talked about Morgenthau, Waltz, Mearsheimer and Hobbes just with myself. Meanwhile, in September, I finished writing the book and changed the format of the meetings. Instead of forcing everyone to learn a certain topic, I announced the course of lectures dedicated to the concept of psychopolitics, which I developed in my book. I made a commitment to study a number of thinkers and examine their work from my linguistic paradigm. And now, here we are. This is the third lecture. The first two were about Machiavelli and Cicero. This one is going to cover the philosophy of Descartes. My working definition for psychopolitics is that it is a science focused on the question: Which is the most powerful language in international politics, and how has it come to be so? Psychopolitics focuses on great thinkers competing for influence or fighting for power over a certain language. Language is primarily regarded as the product of thinking. Psychopolitics has three levels: personal, where different intentions strive for hegemony over one’s thinking; national, where great thinkers question each other’s understanding of a certain language; and international, where languages enforce their rules on each other in an effort to unite humanity.
December 16, 2024 (14290) I conducted another poll and handed out three hundred flyers to people on the street. If it helps to attract new “veritatem inquirenti” to my lectures, I have to prepare a special introduction. I’m going to start off by saying that I’ve been running the philosophy club since November 2021. For the first two years, we worked with a variety of subjects like metaphysics, ethics, aesthetics, epistemology, ontology, etc., studying them independently and meeting once a month to have a discussion. One month, we studied a certain topic; the next month, we picked up a certain philosopher: Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Bacon, Hume, Wittgenstein, etc. In the second part of 2023, we focused on Chinese philosophy, studying Confucianism, Daoism, Legalism and Buddhism, as well as such thinkers as Zhu Xi and Zhuang Zhou. I became obsessed with the Chinese language, studying it for eight hours a day in August and attempting to shift my thinking to it in September by writing my diary exclusively with Chinese characters. It caused a “cognitive overdose”, making me unable to focus on anything for the next couple of months. Then, I revived my power and decided to write a book, dedicating to it the entire year of 2024. Simultaneously, I decided to focus on the study of international relations. At the philosophy club, for the first five months of 2024, we got through realism, liberalism, socialism, constructivism and postmodernism. Later, I suggested delving deeper into realism by studying its great thinkers. This suggestion was rejected, and nobody showed up to the club’s meetings during the summer. So, basically, I talked about Morgenthau, Waltz, Mearsheimer and Hobbes just with myself. Meanwhile, in September, I finished writing the book and changed the format of the meetings. Instead of forcing everyone to learn a certain topic, I announced the course of lectures dedicated to the concept of psychopolitics, which I developed in my book. I made a commitment to study a number of thinkers and examine their work from my linguistic paradigm. And now, here we are. This is the third lecture. The first two were about Machiavelli and Cicero. This one is going to cover the philosophy of Descartes. My working definition for psychopolitics is that it is a science focused on the question: Which is the most powerful language in international politics, and how has it come to be so? Psychopolitics focuses on great thinkers competing for influence or fighting for power over a certain language. Language is primarily regarded as the product of thinking. Psychopolitics has three levels: personal, where different intentions strive for hegemony over one’s thinking; national, where great thinkers question each other’s understanding of a certain language; and international, where languages enforce their rules on each other in an effort to unite humanity.
BY English Science and Literature club🤓✍️📖
Telegram message that reads: "Bear Market Screaming Therapy Group. You are only allowed to send screaming voice notes. Everything else = BAN. Text pics, videos, stickers, gif = BAN. Anything other than screaming = BAN. You think you are smart = BAN. The visual aspect of channels is very critical. In fact, design is the first thing that a potential subscriber pays attention to, even though unconsciously. It’s yet another bloodbath on Satoshi Street. As of press time, Bitcoin (BTC) and the broader cryptocurrency market have corrected another 10 percent amid a massive sell-off. Ethereum (EHT) is down a staggering 15 percent moving close to $1,000, down more than 42 percent on the weekly chart. As the broader market downturn continues, yelling online has become the crypto trader’s latest coping mechanism after the rise of Goblintown Ethereum NFTs at the end of May and beginning of June, where holders made incoherent groaning sounds and role-played as urine-loving goblin creatures in late-night Twitter Spaces. A Hong Kong protester with a petrol bomb. File photo: Dylan Hollingsworth/HKFP.
from us
