This is Farid's testimony before Allah that Im a bigger liar than David Wood, Apus, Shammoun.

Google these figures and see how theyve slandered, insulted, villified Allah and his Messenger ﷺ.

This proves what an outrageous liar and slanderer Farid is.

He has the same disease as his shaykh, ibn Abd al-Wahhab, who claimed that all Muslims of his era were worse mushriks than the Qurayshi mushriks.

Moreover while I offer Farid an open debate or discussion so that I can address his claims against me, he refuses this.

Farid is agitated because I've exposed him as just another Madkhali bootlicker, who will spend night and day accusing pro-Palestinian Muslims like me of shirk but will NEVER raise the smallest peep against his Gulf masters for:

1. Normalizing with Israel
2. Building Hindu temples
3. Spreading the Abrahamic religion kufr

Farid, unlike you, I'll give you a chance to defend yourself.

Speak to me live and I'll let you present evidence to prove you're not just a cheap prostitute for Gulf monarchs.

I finally figured out why failed rappers are so attracted to Wahhabism.

Think about it. Larping as a gangster rapper (wanksta) provides pathetic, weak men the chance to act "hard."

A postman can sit on his couch in the suburbs and pretend like he is a "stone cold gangster" in the ghetto.

Similarly, Wahhabis, especially the Madkhali branch, pretend like they are "hard," declaring the whole Ummah to be "upon kufr."

But like the wanksta rappers, they never go all the way. They never declare their targets to be kafir.

Why not?

Because they can't deal with the consequences of that.

If they declare everyone they accuse of being "upon kufr" to be kafir, they will expose themselves as being unhinged khariji deviants.

So they play these word games, declaring the entire Ummah to be "upon kufr" but never pulling the takfir trigger.

This is also what they do with me.

They cry and whine that Daniel is "upon kufr," Daniel is a "shirk apologist," blah blah blah. They even lay out all the principles that, if applied, would 100% mean I am a kafir. But they don't have the stones to come out and say it.

Why not? Do I have the excuse of ignorance? Clearly not. Years ago, I read all of Kitab al-Tawhid on a lunch break, so ignorance is not an excuse for me.

The real reason is wanksta cowardice.

It's pathetic.

Next time you see a Wahhabi Madkhali, just remember this image 👇

Do you actually care about Palestine or are you a larper?

If you actually care about Palestine, then it is clearer than ever that the ONLY means to prevent a forcible transfer of Palestinians from Gaza is Pan-Islamic Alliance.

All Muslim countries, led by Turkey and Iran, come together to block the US and Israel from their intended ethnic cleansing.

This is what the Palestinian Resistance has been calling for from Day 1.

If you are a low IQ nationalist or sectarian Wahhabi, stop pretending like you care about Palestine. You're at best, a useful idiot for Israel. At worst, you're another Unit 8200 agent from Tel Aviv.

THOSE EMPTY BUSES HAD FAMILIES

Empty buses exploding is the most low effort false flag imaginable.

Forced expulsion of Palestinians from the West Bank soon to commence.

How much are js laughing that they were able to convince a large percentage of the world's most conservative Muslims that their biggest enemy also happens to be Israel's biggest enemy?

Prominent Jew once again calls for wiping out non-Jews.

Hadn't seen this before. What an honor

Daniel Haqiqatjou
@Haqiqatjou
Is Jake Brancatella a pro-Zionist Madkhali?

I want to address the convoluted word salad Jake posted about how he is "not working" with any government agents but it depends on how you define "government" and how you define "agent" and what the meaning of "is" is.

But first let me address his challenge to me.

Yes, Jake, I swear to Allah that I sincerely believe you are a pro-Zionist rat in the same way, but to a lesser degree, that Rabbi Faris is one.

When Muslims around the world agreed to call him Rabbi Faris, it wasn't because anyone thought he was a literal Rabbi or literally on Israel's payroll. I know figurative language is hard for your Wahhabi pea brain to grasp.

But, he is a "Zionist rat" in the sense that he is an unprincipled Madkhali who adjusts his understanding of Islam and aqida based on the politics of the Gulf. So when the Gulf wants to normalize with Israel, build Hindu temples, promote interfaith Abrahamic religion, etc., Rabbi Faris immediately publishes content to religiously justify those Zionist policies.

This is why all Madkhalis end up becoming supporters of Israel and critics of the Palestinian resistance. This is why your Madkhali buddies Shamsi and Wajdi are constantly attacking the Palestinians as grave worshipping deviants and "Rafida lovers." This is why they should all be considered pro-Zionist rats.

And insofar as you have repeatedly attempted to get the approval of these Madkhalis and align with them, you should be considered as a part of them.

But getting on your hands and knees for the Madkhalis like a pig in mud is not the only reason to condemn you.

You also act exactly like a Madkhali. You also adjust your understanding of Islam and aqida in a manner that legitimates Gulf policies and downplays valid criticism of these Gulf policies.

You portray yourself as some forceful advocate of tawhid, consequences be damned. This is how you justify nonstop attacking me "because tawhid is so important." But in reality, your defense of tawhid takes a backseat to your personal agenda and not wanting to alienate the Gulf.

This is why, for months, you have staunchly refused to condemn the Gulf for:

1. Israel normalization
2. Hindu temples
3. Abrahamic religion kufr
4. Secularization policies (including Shakira concerts, etc.)

And more recently, after I exposed your relationship with Rabbi Faris, you have gone further and actually minimized/defended the issue of Israeli normalization and Hindu temples, in your defense of your new friend Rabbi Faris.

And when people called you out for this glaring hypocrisy, Salafis and non-Salafis alike, you accused your critics of not understanding tawhid! This is, of course, the boilerplate excuse that all Madkahli bootlickers give, and you're no different.

But your Madkhali tendencies go further. Not only do you staunchly refuse to criticize Gulf governments, while also defending them, no matter how egregiously they violate tawhid, you also aggressively attack the critics of the Gulf and Israel. For example, you admitted that your main problem with me is my calling for pan-Islamic alliance for Palestine, which you claim means I have deviant aqida based on "love for Rafida." This is EXACTLY the Madkhali attack on anyone who calls for pan-Islamic alliance for Palestine, including Hamas itself, who the Madkhalis attack as Rafidi-loving deviants with faulty aqida. They're labeled as ikhwani, Rafida-loving deviants by Madkhalis, who are simply legitimating the anti-Islamist, pro-Israel policies of the Gulf under the guise of aqida checking.

The only real difference between you and the Madkhalis is that you're not (yet?) explicitly advocating for Israel normalization, like Rabbi Faris does. This is why I'm fair and say you're one notch less than him in backstabbing Palestinians and the Ummah.

In sum, I sincerely believe that you are a pro-Zionist Madkhali much like your friends Shamsi, Wajdi, and Rabbi Faris in the sense that you promote a version of Islam and aqida designed to legitimate Gulf government policies or downplay criticism of those policies, including policies which currently favor normalization with Israel and abandonment of the Palestinians. I swear to Allah that I sincerely believe all this. And I believe any sincere person who is familiar with all the evidence would come to the exact same conclusion.

Wahhabi concepts of aqida, tawhid, and shirk have witnessed constant evolution over the past two and a half centuries.

They have always been fundamentally shaped and reshaped by Saudi state policies and interests.

It is difficult if not impossible to divorce Wahhabism from direct or indirect loyalty to the Saudi state (i.e., the "Land of Tawhid").

This is by design.

If you want to understand Wahhabism do not read Kitab al-Tawhid. Read the history of Saudi Arabia.

I could have avoided being targeted by the Wahhabi network if I simply hadn't called for Pan-Islamic alliance between Muslims of all nationalities and aqida schools.

But this is what my leaders, the Palestinians, called for. And I will NEVER betray my leaders no matter how many million Wahhabis scream in rage.

When they false flag the US: 9/11 with thousands dead

When they false flag themselves: It's a MIRACLE, no casualties

Salih al-Fawzan: "It is better for Jew, Christian or Hindu to retain his religion than to convert to a form of Islam which Permits Istighatha"

Fawzan is Saudi Arabia's Highest Religious Authority. He shares many views of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab.

Thus, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab famously held that the Muslims of his era were mushrik kafirs, and were worse than pre-Islamic pagans because they believed it was permissible to call upon the dead for assistance (istighatha). He then declared a jihad against them, and began killing them and taking their wealth.

Fawzan holds a similar view, which he expresses in a commentary on Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's Kitab al-Tawhid.

Fawzan insists that it is better for a Jew, Christian, or Hindu to retain his religion than to convert to a form of Islam that permits istighatha.

Fawzan also explains that this is why all Muslims have an obligation to engage in a deep study of aqida (creed). If they do not study aqida in depth, they may accidentally come to believe that istighatha is permissible. This will cause them to become kafirs.

(SEE BELOW FOR TEXT)

It is based on these views, from Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and Fawzan, that contemporary Wahhabis demand that all Muslims constantly study aqida, takfir non-Wahhabis, and consider non-Wahhabis to be worse than Jews, Christians, and Hindus.

If you want to know why Wahhabis like Jake, Farid, Adnan, and others keep attacking me, it is because they share these views. Because I am a non-Wahhabi Muslim, they regard me as a kafir mushrik worse than Jews, Christians, and Hindus.

Ordinarily, Wahhabis hide these views for reasons of optics through a type of taqiyya. But when people like me confront them, they then make takfir and begin attacking. In their minds, this is "jihad against the kuffar."

It should be noted that they declare this jihad against me despite the fact that I consider istighatha to be haram, and also think that it is probably shirk - but given a lack of certainty I simply do not takfir those who practice istighatha. For Wahhabis this makes me a kafir who should be attacked and killed.

Now let us turn to the text from Fawzan.

He says:

This is evidence for the affliction of ignorance, as a person may fall into shirk due to ignorance.

In this there is something to spur [us] into learning aqida (Islamic creed) and knowing it and pondering it, out of fear that a person may fall into [the same errors] as these other people.

Today, those who downplay the significance of studying creed and say, “Why study ʿaqīdah when [we] are already Muslims?"—Praise be to God (SubḥānAllāh)!

A Muslim is the one most in need of studying ʿaqīda to correct his [understanding of] Islam, and to safeguard his religion. These people are Muslims, yet they fell into these issues [i.e., errors] because they did not learn.

In this there is evidence on the obligation to study correct aqida, and the obligation to learn about what contradicts it, in terms of shirk, innovations (bidʿa), and superstitions (khurafat) - so that one may avoid them.

Ignorance has caused today's grave-worshippers - or at least many of them – to fall into grave worship. They [mistakenly] believe that such practices are part of Islam. This is a great disaster.

We have even heard that some preachers - whether in America or elsewhere - call people to Sufism and the religion of the grave-worshippers (qubūriyya).

Thus, they take people from one form of disbelief (kufr) to another.

[In reality], it would have been less severe [in wrongness] for a person to remain in his original disbelief than to adopt a form of disbelief that is falsely labeled as Islam!

وهذا دليل على آفة الجهل، وأن الإنسان قد يقع في الشرك بسبب الجهل، وفيه الحث على تعلم العقيدة ومعرفتها والتبصّر فيها خشية أن يقع الإنسان في مثل ما وقع فيه هؤلاء، فالذين ينادون اليوم بتهوين أمر العقيدة، ويقولون: لماذا يدرسون العقيدة وهم مسلمون؟، يا سبحان الله، المسلم هو أولى بدراسة العقيدة من أجل أن يصحِّح إسلامه، ومن أجل أن يحفظ دينه، هؤلاء مسلمون ومع هذا وقعوا في هذه القضية بسبب أنهم لم يتعلموا، ففي هذا دليل على وجوب تعلم العقيدة الصحيحة،

ووجوب تعلّم ما يضادها من الشرك والبدع والخرافات؛ حتى يكون الإنسان على حذر منها، وما أوقع اليوم عُبّاد الأضرحة- أو كثير منهم- في عبادة القبور إلاَّ بسبب الجهل، ويظنون أن هذه من الإسلام، فهذه مصيبة عظيمة، حتى سمعنا أن بعض الدعاة يدعون - في أمريكا وفي غيرها- إلى دين الصوفية وإلى دين القبوريّة، فهم أخرجوهم من كفر إلى كفر، وكونه يبقى على كفره، أخف من كونه ينتقل إلى كفر يسمّى باسم الإسلام.

Yasqueen Simpstitute still pushing the same slop.