Daniel Haqiqatjou Official
Show on Monday inshaAllah with Smile2Jannah! https://www.youtube.com/live/r4SBHz-ZzfY
Going LIVE shortly inshaAllah!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Evidence for anyone who still doubts about Jake's evil agenda.
Imagine how evil you have to be if you are simultaneously promoted by the largest Madkhail and Haddadi social media accounts in the world.
Jake is being promoted both by Rabbi Faris (head of the Madkhalis) and Muhammad bin Shams al-Din (head of the Haddadis).
Everyone who knows these people is aware that Rabbi Faris is waging a war against all conservative pro-Palestine Muslim organizations.
Meanwhile Muhammad bin Shams al-Din is waging a war to discredit and takfir all the major scholars in the Sunni tradition (e.g., al-Ghazali, al-Nawawi, Ibn Hajar, al-Suyuti).
Both figures are boosted by intelligence agencies.
They are promoting Jake because he is an agent of chaos, meant to cause rifts and conflicts among conservative Muslims.
Imagine how evil you have to be if you are simultaneously promoted by the largest Madkhail and Haddadi social media accounts in the world.
Jake is being promoted both by Rabbi Faris (head of the Madkhalis) and Muhammad bin Shams al-Din (head of the Haddadis).
Everyone who knows these people is aware that Rabbi Faris is waging a war against all conservative pro-Palestine Muslim organizations.
Meanwhile Muhammad bin Shams al-Din is waging a war to discredit and takfir all the major scholars in the Sunni tradition (e.g., al-Ghazali, al-Nawawi, Ibn Hajar, al-Suyuti).
Both figures are boosted by intelligence agencies.
They are promoting Jake because he is an agent of chaos, meant to cause rifts and conflicts among conservative Muslims.
Now it should be very obvious why Jake and Farid staunchly refuse to debate me or even have a polite conversation with me.
Not only because they know they can't defend their religious positions. But also because they know I will push them in a way that reveals their connections to anti-Muslim UAE programs and Rabbi Faris.
They know that this would end their careers.
Not only because they know they can't defend their religious positions. But also because they know I will push them in a way that reveals their connections to anti-Muslim UAE programs and Rabbi Faris.
They know that this would end their careers.
If you want a refreshing listen with none of the Wahhabi drama, watch this episode.
https://www.youtube.com/live/r4SBHz-ZzfY
https://www.youtube.com/live/r4SBHz-ZzfY
Farid refuses to disavow or condemn Rabbi Faris in any form or fashion.
Why is Farid able to dedicate months to daily posting about me, attacking me in the harshest terms, implying I'm a kafir shirk apologist, but he can't even bring himself to make a simple negative remark about the most obvious Zionist agent on Muslim Twitter?
He didnt even have to comment on Rabbi Faris as a person. All he had to say was, Rabbi Faris is a disgusting traitor for saying boycott of Israel is haram.
Thats all that was required, but he couldn't even do that.
The blood of Palestinians is cheap for these agents.
Why is Farid able to dedicate months to daily posting about me, attacking me in the harshest terms, implying I'm a kafir shirk apologist, but he can't even bring himself to make a simple negative remark about the most obvious Zionist agent on Muslim Twitter?
He didnt even have to comment on Rabbi Faris as a person. All he had to say was, Rabbi Faris is a disgusting traitor for saying boycott of Israel is haram.
Thats all that was required, but he couldn't even do that.
The blood of Palestinians is cheap for these agents.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What a crazy animal
Shaykh Ahmad Shākir (1892 - 1958) recounted that his father, Shaykh Muhammad Shākir (1866 - 1939), the former deputy of Al-Azhar, once declared an Egyptian preacher a Kāfir.
This preacher was known for his eloquence and, during a Friday sermon, sought to praise a ruler of Egypt who had been honored by the blind writer Taha Hussein. In doing so, he said:
"The blind man came to him, but he did not frown or turn away!"
جاءه الأعمى فما عبس بوجهه وما تولى !
With these words, he alluded to the Qur’anic verse describing the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) in Surah Abasa:
"(He frowned and turned away)"
By drawing this parallel, the preacher indirectly insulted the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), committing an act of blasphemy (Kufr).
Upon hearing this, Shaykh Muhammad Shākir stood before the congregation after the Jumua'ah prayer and declared their prayer invalid, insisting that they must repeat it because the preacher had performed Kufr (blasphemed) against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him).
Ahmed Shākir later reflected on the preacher’s fate:
"But Allah did not leave this wrongdoer unpunished in this world before his punishment in the Hereafter. I swear by Allah, I saw him with my own eyes—years later, after he had once held a position of pride and influence, sought by the great and noble—I found him humiliated and degraded, standing as a servant at the door of a mosque in Cairo, collecting the sandals of worshippers in disgrace and lowliness. I felt ashamed for him to see me, for I recognized him, and he recognized me. Yet, there was no place for pity, nor for gloating, for a noble person rises above gloating. But what I witnessed was a lesson and a warning."
See attached picture.
A word of caution: Never diminish the status of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) in any way. His honor is beyond comparison, and playing with words to equate therapy with general help-seeking is misleading. Therapy, by its established definition, is a structured form of treatment for individuals dealing with psychological disorders or maladjustment issues.
The National Institute of Mental Health defines psychotherapy as:
"Psychotherapy (also called talk therapy) refers to a variety of treatments that aim to help a person identify and change troubling emotions, thoughts, and behaviors."
The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) was never in need of psychotherapy, nor did he suffer from any psychological disorders or maladjustment. His character was perfected by God, and he was the most balanced, resilient, and spiritually elevated of all people. Any narrations suggesting otherwise suffer from serious flaws in their transmission. And if an authentic hadith exists, we must approach it with the understanding of its historical and theological context, not impose modern psychological frameworks onto events that took place over a thousand years ago.
What we see in this instance is deeply concerning. The physician in question repeatedly alters the definition of therapy to avoid the grave mistake of disrespecting the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). Such manipulations only serve as an escape route from accountability. Do not use the Prophet to promote personal services. His name and status are sacred and should never be reduced to a marketing tool.
-Dr Abu Ayah
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=122137821920562566&id=61566876993625
This preacher was known for his eloquence and, during a Friday sermon, sought to praise a ruler of Egypt who had been honored by the blind writer Taha Hussein. In doing so, he said:
"The blind man came to him, but he did not frown or turn away!"
جاءه الأعمى فما عبس بوجهه وما تولى !
With these words, he alluded to the Qur’anic verse describing the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) in Surah Abasa:
"(He frowned and turned away)"
By drawing this parallel, the preacher indirectly insulted the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), committing an act of blasphemy (Kufr).
Upon hearing this, Shaykh Muhammad Shākir stood before the congregation after the Jumua'ah prayer and declared their prayer invalid, insisting that they must repeat it because the preacher had performed Kufr (blasphemed) against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him).
Ahmed Shākir later reflected on the preacher’s fate:
"But Allah did not leave this wrongdoer unpunished in this world before his punishment in the Hereafter. I swear by Allah, I saw him with my own eyes—years later, after he had once held a position of pride and influence, sought by the great and noble—I found him humiliated and degraded, standing as a servant at the door of a mosque in Cairo, collecting the sandals of worshippers in disgrace and lowliness. I felt ashamed for him to see me, for I recognized him, and he recognized me. Yet, there was no place for pity, nor for gloating, for a noble person rises above gloating. But what I witnessed was a lesson and a warning."
See attached picture.
A word of caution: Never diminish the status of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) in any way. His honor is beyond comparison, and playing with words to equate therapy with general help-seeking is misleading. Therapy, by its established definition, is a structured form of treatment for individuals dealing with psychological disorders or maladjustment issues.
The National Institute of Mental Health defines psychotherapy as:
"Psychotherapy (also called talk therapy) refers to a variety of treatments that aim to help a person identify and change troubling emotions, thoughts, and behaviors."
The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) was never in need of psychotherapy, nor did he suffer from any psychological disorders or maladjustment. His character was perfected by God, and he was the most balanced, resilient, and spiritually elevated of all people. Any narrations suggesting otherwise suffer from serious flaws in their transmission. And if an authentic hadith exists, we must approach it with the understanding of its historical and theological context, not impose modern psychological frameworks onto events that took place over a thousand years ago.
What we see in this instance is deeply concerning. The physician in question repeatedly alters the definition of therapy to avoid the grave mistake of disrespecting the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). Such manipulations only serve as an escape route from accountability. Do not use the Prophet to promote personal services. His name and status are sacred and should never be reduced to a marketing tool.
-Dr Abu Ayah
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=122137821920562566&id=61566876993625
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trans is still a thing?
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Rabbi Faris says:
Normalization with Israel: HALAL
Boycotting Israel: HARAM
Any Wahhabi who does not unequivocally condemn this Zionist agent is being controlled.
Normalization with Israel: HALAL
Boycotting Israel: HARAM
Any Wahhabi who does not unequivocally condemn this Zionist agent is being controlled.
Wahhabi opinions on aqida are all either Deviance or Deception
The entire Wahhabi brand is based on the claim that they are "strict' and "orthodox" in matters of aqida.
But this is entirely wrong. Wahhabi opinions on aqida are either deviance or deception.
Why?
Wahhabis claim to be orthodox because they lay down particular principles which, if actually applied, would lead to takfiring the entire ummah and its scholars.
These principles require takfiring the Asharites and the Maturidites. This because these groups do not accept Wahhabi claims regarding Allah's attributes, such as Him being physically located above the throne, and speaking with words and sounds.
These principles also require takfiring Sufis and most members of the four legal schools. This is because these groups do not accept Wahhabi claims regarding the obligation to takfir those who perform istighatha.
When it comes to these principles, Wahhabis split into two groups.
The first actually applies them and takfirs the entire ummah, thereby falling into a deviant form of kharijism. This is like ISIS.
The second refuses to apply them, at least in any open manner. They don't want to openly takfir figures like al-Ghazali, al-Nawawi, al-Subki, Ibn Hajar al-Haytami, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, and al-Suyuti.
This second group boasts about how strict and uncompromising its aqida principles are. But it is all a hoax and deception because they never actually apply the principles.
Jake and Farid fall into this second category.
They larp as orthodox Muslims who are "strict" on aqida principles, and who do not shy away from takfir. But they also refuse to debate or discuss these principles because they do not want to be called out on the fact that they don't actually apply them in any genuine or systematic fashion.
To justify themselves, they often expand the notion of al-udhr bi-l-jahl in bizarre and laughable ways. For instance, they will say that one cannot takfir hadith masters like al-Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for problematic ta'wil of Allah's attributes in hadiths, because they were "ignorant" of the meaning of these hadiths.
But if the most knowledgeable scholars like al-Nawawi and Ibn Hajar are excused for "ignorance" in the field of hadith, then everyone has a claim to excuse for ignorance as they are less knowledgeable than such figures.
The whole notion of "strict" Wahhabi aqida is a huge dishonest hoax.
The entire Wahhabi brand is based on the claim that they are "strict' and "orthodox" in matters of aqida.
But this is entirely wrong. Wahhabi opinions on aqida are either deviance or deception.
Why?
Wahhabis claim to be orthodox because they lay down particular principles which, if actually applied, would lead to takfiring the entire ummah and its scholars.
These principles require takfiring the Asharites and the Maturidites. This because these groups do not accept Wahhabi claims regarding Allah's attributes, such as Him being physically located above the throne, and speaking with words and sounds.
These principles also require takfiring Sufis and most members of the four legal schools. This is because these groups do not accept Wahhabi claims regarding the obligation to takfir those who perform istighatha.
When it comes to these principles, Wahhabis split into two groups.
The first actually applies them and takfirs the entire ummah, thereby falling into a deviant form of kharijism. This is like ISIS.
The second refuses to apply them, at least in any open manner. They don't want to openly takfir figures like al-Ghazali, al-Nawawi, al-Subki, Ibn Hajar al-Haytami, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, and al-Suyuti.
This second group boasts about how strict and uncompromising its aqida principles are. But it is all a hoax and deception because they never actually apply the principles.
Jake and Farid fall into this second category.
They larp as orthodox Muslims who are "strict" on aqida principles, and who do not shy away from takfir. But they also refuse to debate or discuss these principles because they do not want to be called out on the fact that they don't actually apply them in any genuine or systematic fashion.
To justify themselves, they often expand the notion of al-udhr bi-l-jahl in bizarre and laughable ways. For instance, they will say that one cannot takfir hadith masters like al-Nawawi and Ibn Hajar for problematic ta'wil of Allah's attributes in hadiths, because they were "ignorant" of the meaning of these hadiths.
But if the most knowledgeable scholars like al-Nawawi and Ibn Hajar are excused for "ignorance" in the field of hadith, then everyone has a claim to excuse for ignorance as they are less knowledgeable than such figures.
The whole notion of "strict" Wahhabi aqida is a huge dishonest hoax.