Daniel Haqiqatjou Official

Daniel Haqiqatjou
@Haqiqatjou
Is Jake Brancatella a pro-Zionist Madkhali?

I want to address the convoluted word salad Jake posted about how he is "not working" with any government agents but it depends on how you define "government" and how you define "agent" and what the meaning of "is" is.

But first let me address his challenge to me.

Yes, Jake, I swear to Allah that I sincerely believe you are a pro-Zionist rat in the same way, but to a lesser degree, that Rabbi Faris is one.

When Muslims around the world agreed to call him Rabbi Faris, it wasn't because anyone thought he was a literal Rabbi or literally on Israel's payroll. I know figurative language is hard for your Wahhabi pea brain to grasp.

But, he is a "Zionist rat" in the sense that he is an unprincipled Madkhali who adjusts his understanding of Islam and aqida based on the politics of the Gulf. So when the Gulf wants to normalize with Israel, build Hindu temples, promote interfaith Abrahamic religion, etc., Rabbi Faris immediately publishes content to religiously justify those Zionist policies.

This is why all Madkhalis end up becoming supporters of Israel and critics of the Palestinian resistance. This is why your Madkhali buddies Shamsi and Wajdi are constantly attacking the Palestinians as grave worshipping deviants and "Rafida lovers." This is why they should all be considered pro-Zionist rats.

And insofar as you have repeatedly attempted to get the approval of these Madkhalis and align with them, you should be considered as a part of them.

But getting on your hands and knees for the Madkhalis like a pig in mud is not the only reason to condemn you.

You also act exactly like a Madkhali. You also adjust your understanding of Islam and aqida in a manner that legitimates Gulf policies and downplays valid criticism of these Gulf policies.

You portray yourself as some forceful advocate of tawhid, consequences be damned. This is how you justify nonstop attacking me "because tawhid is so important." But in reality, your defense of tawhid takes a backseat to your personal agenda and not wanting to alienate the Gulf.

This is why, for months, you have staunchly refused to condemn the Gulf for:

1. Israel normalization
2. Hindu temples
3. Abrahamic religion kufr
4. Secularization policies (including Shakira concerts, etc.)

And more recently, after I exposed your relationship with Rabbi Faris, you have gone further and actually minimized/defended the issue of Israeli normalization and Hindu temples, in your defense of your new friend Rabbi Faris.

And when people called you out for this glaring hypocrisy, Salafis and non-Salafis alike, you accused your critics of not understanding tawhid! This is, of course, the boilerplate excuse that all Madkahli bootlickers give, and you're no different.

But your Madkhali tendencies go further. Not only do you staunchly refuse to criticize Gulf governments, while also defending them, no matter how egregiously they violate tawhid, you also aggressively attack the critics of the Gulf and Israel. For example, you admitted that your main problem with me is my calling for pan-Islamic alliance for Palestine, which you claim means I have deviant aqida based on "love for Rafida." This is EXACTLY the Madkhali attack on anyone who calls for pan-Islamic alliance for Palestine, including Hamas itself, who the Madkhalis attack as Rafidi-loving deviants with faulty aqida. They're labeled as ikhwani, Rafida-loving deviants by Madkhalis, who are simply legitimating the anti-Islamist, pro-Israel policies of the Gulf under the guise of aqida checking.

The only real difference between you and the Madkhalis is that you're not (yet?) explicitly advocating for Israel normalization, like Rabbi Faris does. This is why I'm fair and say you're one notch less than him in backstabbing Palestinians and the Ummah.

www.tgoop.com/haqiqatjou/10949

3.8K viewsFeb 21 at 19:44

Daniel Haqiqatjou
@Haqiqatjou
Is Jake Brancatella a pro-Zionist Madkhali?

I want to address the convoluted word salad Jake posted about how he is "not working" with any government agents but it depends on how you define "government" and how you define "agent" and what the meaning of "is" is.

But first let me address his challenge to me.

Yes, Jake, I swear to Allah that I sincerely believe you are a pro-Zionist rat in the same way, but to a lesser degree, that Rabbi Faris is one.

When Muslims around the world agreed to call him Rabbi Faris, it wasn't because anyone thought he was a literal Rabbi or literally on Israel's payroll. I know figurative language is hard for your Wahhabi pea brain to grasp.

But, he is a "Zionist rat" in the sense that he is an unprincipled Madkhali who adjusts his understanding of Islam and aqida based on the politics of the Gulf. So when the Gulf wants to normalize with Israel, build Hindu temples, promote interfaith Abrahamic religion, etc., Rabbi Faris immediately publishes content to religiously justify those Zionist policies.

This is why all Madkhalis end up becoming supporters of Israel and critics of the Palestinian resistance. This is why your Madkhali buddies Shamsi and Wajdi are constantly attacking the Palestinians as grave worshipping deviants and "Rafida lovers." This is why they should all be considered pro-Zionist rats.

And insofar as you have repeatedly attempted to get the approval of these Madkhalis and align with them, you should be considered as a part of them.

But getting on your hands and knees for the Madkhalis like a pig in mud is not the only reason to condemn you.

You also act exactly like a Madkhali. You also adjust your understanding of Islam and aqida in a manner that legitimates Gulf policies and downplays valid criticism of these Gulf policies.

You portray yourself as some forceful advocate of tawhid, consequences be damned. This is how you justify nonstop attacking me "because tawhid is so important." But in reality, your defense of tawhid takes a backseat to your personal agenda and not wanting to alienate the Gulf.

This is why, for months, you have staunchly refused to condemn the Gulf for:

1. Israel normalization
2. Hindu temples
3. Abrahamic religion kufr
4. Secularization policies (including Shakira concerts, etc.)

And more recently, after I exposed your relationship with Rabbi Faris, you have gone further and actually minimized/defended the issue of Israeli normalization and Hindu temples, in your defense of your new friend Rabbi Faris.

And when people called you out for this glaring hypocrisy, Salafis and non-Salafis alike, you accused your critics of not understanding tawhid! This is, of course, the boilerplate excuse that all Madkahli bootlickers give, and you're no different.

But your Madkhali tendencies go further. Not only do you staunchly refuse to criticize Gulf governments, while also defending them, no matter how egregiously they violate tawhid, you also aggressively attack the critics of the Gulf and Israel. For example, you admitted that your main problem with me is my calling for pan-Islamic alliance for Palestine, which you claim means I have deviant aqida based on "love for Rafida." This is EXACTLY the Madkhali attack on anyone who calls for pan-Islamic alliance for Palestine, including Hamas itself, who the Madkhalis attack as Rafidi-loving deviants with faulty aqida. They're labeled as ikhwani, Rafida-loving deviants by Madkhalis, who are simply legitimating the anti-Islamist, pro-Israel policies of the Gulf under the guise of aqida checking.

The only real difference between you and the Madkhalis is that you're not (yet?) explicitly advocating for Israel normalization, like Rabbi Faris does. This is why I'm fair and say you're one notch less than him in backstabbing Palestinians and the Ummah.

BY Daniel Haqiqatjou Official